Kratos Multiphysics Forums

General => Proposals and Complaints => Topic started by: vmataix on May 01, 2016, 05:24:31 PM

Title: Condition3D in Kratos core should be called Condition3D3N
Post by: vmataix on May 01, 2016, 05:24:31 PM
I added yesterday some basic conditions to the Kratos core, basically Condition3D4N, Condition3D6N... and I realised that the Condition3D is just for the triangle, and for consistence should be called Condition3D3N.

Additionally, a Kratos core subforum should be created.
Title: Re: Condition3D in Kratos core should be called Condition3D3N
Post by: vmataix on May 02, 2016, 12:59:13 PM
I added the condition of the quadratric line, anda surprise, according to this criteria the name should be Condition3D3N, maybe we should use other criteria, line ConditionLine3D3N and ConditionTriangle3D3N, etc...
Title: Re: Condition3D in Kratos core should be called Condition3D3N
Post by: Josep Maria on May 08, 2016, 11:21:44 AM
In the SolidMechanics we use next nomeclature:
PointConditionXDYN,  LineConditionXDYN,  SurfaceConditionXDYN.
Where X is the dimension number and Y the number of nodes of the geometry. The integration quadrature is not named anywhere. If X and Y coincide in different geometries some specific name will be needed.
Title: Re: Condition3D in Kratos core should be called Condition3D3N
Post by: pooyan on May 12, 2016, 10:39:46 PM
I agree with Josep Maria about this naming convention
Title: Re: Condition3D in Kratos core should be called Condition3D3N
Post by: riccardo on September 06, 2016, 02:03:48 PM
Naming Convection looks fine to me.

then we need to take care of replacing Condition3D by SurfaceCondition3D3N, as it is used in quite many places, including in python scripts where the change will not be detected automatically

Riccardo