2D formulation for Electrostatic Problems
From KratosWiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Stiffness Matrix K<sup>(e)</sup>) |
(→2D formulation for Triangular Elements) |
||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::<math> | ||
+ | \frac{\partial N_1}{\partial \alpha}=-1 \qquad \frac{\partial N_2}{\partial \alpha}=1 \qquad \frac{\partial N_3}{\partial \alpha}=0 | ||
+ | </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::<math> | ||
+ | \frac{\partial N_1}{\partial \beta}=-1 \qquad \frac{\partial N_2}{\partial \beta}=0 \qquad \frac{\partial N_3}{\partial \beta}=1 | ||
+ | </math> | ||
::<math>\mathbf{J^{(e)}} = | ::<math>\mathbf{J^{(e)}} = |
Revision as of 18:03, 12 November 2009
The 2D Electrostatic Poisson's equation given by the governing PDE and its boundary conditions:
can be written as (see the General formulation for Electrostatic Problems):
with (n is the number of nodes of the element):
2D formulation for Triangular Elements
After applying the numerical integration for triangular elements by using the natural coordinates, we obtain:
Stiffness Matrix K(e)