2D formulation for Electrostatic Problems
From KratosWiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→2D formulation for Triangular Elements) |
m (→2D formulation for Triangular Elements) |
||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
::<math> | ::<math> | ||
− | x = N_1 x_1 + N_2 x_2 + N_3 x_3 = ( 1 - \alpha - \beta) x_1 + \alpha x_2 + \beta x_3 | + | x = N_1 x_1 + N_2 x_2 + N_3 x_3 = ( 1 - \alpha - \beta) x_1 + \alpha x_2 + \beta x_3 \, |
</math> | </math> | ||
::<math> | ::<math> | ||
− | y = N_1 y_1 + N_2 y_2 + N_3 y_3 = ( 1 - \alpha - \beta) y_1 + \alpha y_2 + \beta y_3 | + | y = N_1 y_1 + N_2 y_2 + N_3 y_3 = ( 1 - \alpha - \beta) y_1 + \alpha y_2 + \beta y_3 \, |
</math> | </math> | ||
Revision as of 18:07, 12 November 2009
The 2D Electrostatic Poisson's equation given by the governing PDE and its boundary conditions:
can be written as (see the General formulation for Electrostatic Problems):
with (n is the number of nodes of the element):
2D formulation for Triangular Elements
After applying the numerical integration for triangular elements by using the natural coordinates, we obtain:
Stiffness Matrix K(e)