2D formulation for Magnetostatic Problems
From KratosWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
− | ::<math> | + | ::<math> A_z(x,y) \cong \hat A_z(x,y) = \sum_{i=0}^n N_i (x,y) a_i = \mathbf{N}^{(e)} · \mathbf{a}^{(e)}</math> |
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
\qquad | \qquad | ||
− | \mathbf{ | + | \mathbf{D}= |
\begin{bmatrix} | \begin{bmatrix} | ||
− | \ | + | \frac{1}{\mu_y} & 0 \\ |
\, \\ | \, \\ | ||
− | 0 & \ | + | 0 & \frac{1}{\mu_x} |
\end{bmatrix} | \end{bmatrix} | ||
</math> | </math> |
Revision as of 10:03, 2 February 2010
The 2D Magnetostatic Poisson's equation given by the governing PDE and its boundary conditions:
can be written as (see the General formulation for Magnetostatic Problems):
with (n is the number of nodes of the element):
2D formulation for Triangular Elements
After applying the numerical integration for triangular elements by using the natural coordinates, we obtain:
Stiffness Matrix K(e)
Source Vector f(e)
- Linear case (np=1 integration point):
- Quadratic case (np=3 integration points):